In an earlier blog, I spoke briefly about Florida’s impossibility of performance doctrine. A party is discharged from performing a contractual obligation "which is impossible to perform and the party neither assumed the risk of impossibility nor could have acted to prevent the event rendering the performance impossible." Marathon Sunsets, Inc. v. Coldiron, 189 So. 3d 235, 236 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016).
One thing that is important to note, “courts are reluctant to excuse performance that is not impossible but merely inconvenient, profitless, and expensive . . . .” Valencia Ctr. v. Publix Super Mkt., 464 So. 2d 1267, 1269 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985) (emphasis added).
So if you’re trying to get out of a contract due to the coronavirus emergency arguing “impossibility of performance,” you should make sure that performance is actually impossible. Performance will not be excused if it is merely inconvenient, expensive, or profitless.
In Valencia, a tenant tried to get out of a lease arguing impossibility because the tenant’s portion of the taxes increased substantially. Valencia argued that the tax increase was “incapacitating.” The Court disagreed, “feelings of financial frustration do not necessarily equate to findings of frustration or impossibility under the law.”
I have already started to see people try to get out of contracts due to the financial impacts of the COVID-19 emergency. It’s important to note that just because a contract is no longer profitable, doesn’t mean it won’t be enforced.
April 15, 2020
The information you obtain on this website is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult with an attorney for individual advice regarding your own situation.
COVID-19: Inconvenience Doesn't Void Contract
Se Habla Español